Mammography Role in Screening of Breast Cancer

Noor-ul-Ain Ali, Kinza Latif, Komal Naseer

Abstract


OBJECTIVE: This study was done to determine role of mammography in screening of breast cancer.

STUDY DURATION AND DESIGN: This study was done in a period of six months from July 2017 to December 2017.

PLACE OF STUDY: This study was done in radiology department of Bahawal Victoria Hospital Bahawalpur, Pakistan. A tertiary hospital located in the center of city.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: There were 935 houses selected from the city of Bahawalpur randomly within the radius of 10 kilometer. These all homes were visited and one female from each house was invited for mammography in Victoria Hospital Bahawalpur radiology department. Out of 935 houses 900 sent their females for the test and 35 refused for this. Total 900 women were undergone the procedure. Their data was documented such as age, number of children, family history of malignancy or breast cancer, education level and marital status etc. In which patients malignancy was suspected they were undergone FNAC to confirm the diagnosis. Which patients showed benign conditions they were referred to relevant specialty for the treatment. Informed Consent was taken from these ladies for including their data in the study. Age range of these patients was 35-55 years with mean age of 40.5 years. Results were calculated in the form of frequencies and numbers and expressed via tables and charts. Data was composed on Microsoft office version 2017.    

RESULTS: There were 900 female which were undergone mammography. Out of them 710 had normal findings and, 82 showed fibrocystic changes, 10 females had fibroadenoma, 31 had palpable lymph nodes, in 4 cases dysplasia and ductal ectasia was found. Out of 900 females only 27 showed malignancy. In these 27 females FNAC was performed and sample was sent for histopathology to confirm malignancy. There were 110 females with age 35-40 years, 171 with 41-45 years, 114 with 46-50 years, 206 with 51-55 years and 109 females were having age of more than 55 years. It was seen that most of the females were with age 40-50 years. Mostly malignancy was common in those females which were having age above 45 years. In young age malignancy is uncommon. In these females fibrocystic changes were common. Some of them showed just lymph nodes enlargement and no other changes were found. Out of 27 cases with suspicion of malignancy on mammography 21 confirmed carcinoma breast on histopathology. Positive predictive value was 74%.

CONCLUSION: Mammography is a very useful screening test for breast cancer with significant high positive predictive value. It is cheap test and easily performed. This technique can be used on mass population to determine prevalence of breast cancer.


Keywords


breast cancer, mammography, screening test

Full Text:

PDF

References


Schwartz ST, Shires GT, Spencer FC, Daly JM, Fischner JE, Galloway AC. Breast. In: Schwartz’s Principles of Surgery, 7th ed. New York: McGraw Hill; 1999. p.533-599.

Jamrozik K, Byrne MJ, Dewar JM, Harvey JM, Ingram DM, Parsons RW, Watson N. The effect of mammographic screening on invasive Breast Cancer in Western Australia. Med J Aust 2000 Mar 6; 172

(5): 203-6.

Hislop TG, Worth AJ, Kan L, Rousseau E. Post screen-detected Breast Cancer within the Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1997 Feb; 42(3): 235-42.

McCarthy BD, Yood MU, MacWilliam CH, Lee MJ; Screening mammography use: The importance of a population perspective. Am J Prev Med 1996 Mar-Apr; 12(2): 91-5.

Lalloo F, Boggis CR, Evans DG, Shenton A, Threl-fall AG, Howell A. Screening by mammography, women with a family history of Breast Cancer. Eur J Cancer 1998 May; 34(6): 937-40.

M. Marasteh, et al. Shiraz Breast Cancer Study part II: Screening mammography in a population based Breast Cancer survey. Med J Islamic Republic Iran; 1999 Aug; 13(2): 97-9.

Thurfjell EL, Lernevall KA, Taube AA. Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program. Radiol 1994 Apr; 191(1): 241-4.

Mansourian H, Nikookar L. Discrepancy of mam-mography and sonographic findings and surgery in women more than 30 years old with breast mass. Yazd Med Univ J 2003; 4: 8-15.

Iglehart JD, Kaelin CM. Diseases of the Breast. In: Sabiston’s Textbook of Surgery, 17th ed. (Vol.1) Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company; 2004. p. 867-928.

Gotzsche PC, Olsen O. Is screening for Breast Can-cer with mammography justifiable? Lancet 2000 Jan 8; 355: 129-34.

Mattsson A, Leitz W, Rutqvist LE. Radiation risk and mammographic screening of women from 40 to 49 years of age: Effect on Breast Cancer rates and years of life. Br J Cancer 2000; 82(1): 220-6.

Hale DA, Cook JF, Baniqued Z, Silva-Hale A, Mol-loy M, Pearl RH, Hadro NC, Jaques DP. Selective digital enhancement of conventional film mammography. J Surg Oncol 1994 Jan; 55(1): 42-6.

Moody-Ayers SY, Wells CK, Feinstein AR. Benign tumors and early detection in mammography scre-ened patients of a natural cohort with Breast Cancer. Arch Intern Med 2000 Apr 24; 160(8): 1109-15.

Actuality dans le dyepistagede cancer [Screening for Breast Cancer: What is new?] Bull Cancer 2000 March; 87(3): 239-43.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.