Disability and the Politics of Nomenclature
This paper argues that issues of contestation around nomenclature are of great significance in struggles and social movements of marginalized groups. The use of nomenclature is a contested terrain as far as the disability rights movement and the politics is concerned, and usages like handicapped, differently abled, divyang and persons with disabilities are heavily loaded with social meanings that can have decisive implecations for public policy on disability as well as the larger understanding of the very phenomenon of disability.
Barnes, Colin, “Reflections on Doing Emancipatory Disability Research”, in John Swain, Sally French, Colin Barnes and Carol Thomas (ed) Disabling Barriers Enabling Environments, (Second Edition), Sage Publications, London, 2004.
Braddock, David L., and Parish, Susan L., “An Institutional History of Disability”, in Gary L Albrecht, Katherine D Seelman, and Michael Bury (ed) Handbook of Disability Studies, Sage Publications International, London, 2000.
Foucault, Michel, Madness and Civilization: a History of Insanity in the Age of Reason, Vintage Books, New York, 2001.
Okrent, Arika, “Why Did ‘Disabled’ Replaced ‘Handicapped’ as the Preferred Term?”, Mental Floss, 2015, http://mentalfloss.com/article/69361/why-did-disabled-replace-handicapped-preferred-term
Oliver, Mike, Disability: From Theory to Practice, Palgrave, Hampshire, 1996.
Sen, Amartya, The Idea of Justice, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2009.
Shakespeare, Tom, Disability Rights and Wrongs, Routledge, New York, 2006.
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.