Effect of Insurance Regulation on Market Development

HASITKUMAR HIRJI NAGARIYA

Abstract


This paper considers the various regulatory approaches implemented by insurance regulators and supervisors globally in order to achieve the objective of inclusive insurance market development. The primary question that this paper seeks to address is: what is the optimal regulatory approach to be followed by a particular country to promote increased access to insurance in a particular product market or across multiple product markets?

From the experience of the countries scrutinised as part of this synthesis process, five distinctive regulatory approaches to the promotion of access to insurance have been identified. These five regulatory approaches can be located on a continuum according to the level of state intervention in or direction of the market. Each of the approaches are defined and described in detail in Section 2.2. They are:

Public provision approach: the state identifies the risk to be covered and either acts as risk carrier itself or directly and/or indirectly subsidises insurance to the population, often to achieve a public policy objective ancillary to the insurance sector, such as health or rural development.

Directive approach: the state requires insurers to meet certain targets in terms of access to insurance. Regulatory tools are therefore used to leverage the market mechanism.

Concessionary approach: this approach relies on creating market incentives rather than direct state intervention to achieve the desired objective of access to insurance. It does so by creating proportionate regulatory concessions to encourage provision of access-friendly products as defined in the local context.

Nudge approach: the state creates an enabling environment for access to insurance and may lower the compliance burden across the board to promote access, but there are no direct state intervention and no explicit concessions for access to insurance.

Long-term market development approach: this approach entails no direct state direction of the market, with the focus instead being on building market and state infrastructure and capacity over time, before access to insurance can be pursued as an explicit objective.


Keywords


Words:Regulation,Market,Development

Full Text:

PDF

References


Access to Insurance Initiative, 2012. Access to Insurance Initiative: Inside the initiative. Enhancing regulatory and supervisory capacity, growing financial inclusion and advancing insurance markets, s.l.: Access to Insurance Initiative.

Access to Insurance Initiative. 2008. Making insurance markets work for the poor: microinsurance policy, regulation and supervision. Evidence from Five Country Case Studies, s.l.: s.n.

Access to Insurance Initiative. (2009). Towards a strategy for microinsurance development in Zambia.

Access to Insurance Initiative. (2010). Microinsurance in Brazil: towards a strategy.

Access to Insurance Initaitive. (2011). Developing the market for microinsurance in Mongolia.

Access to Insurance Initiative. (2012). Swaziland microinsurance review. A market and regulatory

analysis.

Access to Insurance Initiative. (2012). Nigeria Microinsurance Diagnostic Country Report.

Access to Insurance Initiative. (2012). Tanzania Access to Insurance DiagnosticAccess to Insurance Initiative. Forthcoming. Microinsurance in China.

ADB, 2013. Assessment of Microinsurance as Emerging Microfinance Service for the Poor. The case of the Philippines, s.l.: Asian Development Bank.

Angove, J. & Manje, L., 2012. Demand and Supply of Microinsurance in Lesotho, s.l.: s.n.

Balaam, D. & Veseth, M., 1996. Introduction to International Political Economy. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Carmichael, J. & Pomerleano, M., 2002. Development and Regulation of Non-Bank Financial Institutions. s.l.:World Bank.

Cenfri, 2010. Kenya microinsurance landscape, s.l.: Cenfri.

Cenfri, 2010. Opportunities and challenges for microinsurance in Ethiopia, s.l.: Cenfri.

Cenfri, 2013. The nature of informality in the South African funeral services market – implications for policymakers and regulators, s.l.: s.n.

Cenfri, forthcoming. Access to insurance in Mozambique, s.l.: s.n.

Cenfri, Forthcoming. Drivers of scale in microinsurance, s.l.: s.n.

Cenfri, forthcoming. Making Access to Financial Services Possible (MAP) Toolkit, s.l.: s.n.

Cenfri, forthcoming. Regulating for inclusive insurance markets in SADC, s.l.: s.n.

FinMark Trust, 2009. Finscope Botswana 2009 dataset, s.l.: FinMark Trust.

FinMark Trust, 2011. Finscope Namibia 2011 dataset, s.l.: FinMark Trust.

FinMark Trust, 2012. FinScope South Africa Consumer Survey, s.l.: FinMark Trust.

FinScope, 2011. FinScope Swaziland 2011, s.l.: s.n.

Genesis Analytics, 2008. Making insurance markets work for the poor: microinsurance policy, regulation and supervision. South African case study, s.l.: Genesis Analytics.

Genesis Analytics, 2008. Making insurance markets work for the poor: microinsurance policy, regulation and supervision. Uganda case study, s.l.: Genesis Analytics.

IAIS, 2011. Insurance core principles, standards, guidance and assessment methodology, s.l.: International Association of Insurance Supervisors.

IAIS, 2012. Application paper on Regulation and Supervision supporting Inclusive Insurance Markets, s.l.: International Assosciation of Insurance Supervisors.

Madera , B., 2011. Zimbabwe: Insurance Sector Overtraded.. [Online] Available at: http://allafrica.com/stories/201107080386.html [Accessed 20 12 2012].

M-CRIL, 2008. Making insurance markets work for the poor: microinsurance policy, regulation and supervision. Indian case study, s.l.: Micro-Credit Ratings International Limited .

Microfinance Services, forthcoming. Thailand Financial Inclusion Synthesis Assessment Report, s.l.: s.n.

Microinsurance Agency Holdings, 2007. Micro insurance in Africa: filling the distribution gap.. s.l., 3rd African Microfinance Conference,.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.